Harvey Levin seems to have been taken in by all this Talmudic hair-splitting that reactionary types (the very same monsters who consistently want Progressive policy proposals to be deliberated before being enacted into law, like they don't even know what Progressive means. It means good, you ignoramuses) regularly indulge in, as if they seriously expect anyone to play along with the absurd notion that expressing opinions outside of the r/politics consensus is anything other than just short of a hate crime (fortunately hate crimes laws are subjective enough to not apply to such speech until it becomes viable for judges apply them so). Such is their ignorance of the Constitution, that they seem to believe that mere chilling of dissent is objectionable, when clearly the Constitution merely forbids Congreff from making laws abridging freedom of speech. To object to abridgments coming from anything other than Congreff itself is as absurd as if liberals were to characterize criticism of sexually violent material on elementary school reading lists as "censorship". It would simply be intolerably embarrassing to be associated with a party so eager to define terms with such sloppy broadness.
Wait, actually we're the Talmudic scholars, and they're the simplistic black and white guys. I'll fix that later, in the meantime, suffice it to say Harvey Levin should eat poop.
Post a Comment